|
Post by aefstraggler on Oct 15, 2013 13:24:01 GMT -8
As for WPG - the Jerkin, overall, is OK - but unless he's changed his pattern - it's a cookie cutter approach - i.e. at least one pannel is using what I believe are called cut-outs (smaller pieces of leather sewn together to make a large piece) - problem is - regardless of size - all of the jerkins have the exact same cut-out. Cut-outs were OK - but they were not used if the pieces of leather were large enough (why cut a large piece of leather in two - just to sew it back together?) And they certainly would not all be the same shape, etc. Still, of the vendors I looked at - two use cut-outs - and the one who doesn't use cut-outs has much worse offenses in what they offer.
|
|
|
Post by muddhen on Oct 16, 2013 14:12:27 GMT -8
Anybody have a photo of the buttons and buttonholes, I have picked up a jerkin with what appears to be uniform wool lining, not pieced leather, not waisted, but the buttons don't seem right to me.
|
|
|
Post by joesweeney on Oct 17, 2013 6:47:32 GMT -8
Hope this helps in making a decision. Here are pictures of two Great War British Jerkins--One leather dated 1918 and the other a Double twill cotton. The Buttons were always made of wood covered with leather, with a ring shank secured through the jerkin by split rings. (Ones made for use in Russia had toggles and RAF/RFC had a separate pattern). Button holes were re-enforced. American made examples are different in the use of 4 hole buttons and simpler button holes. Hope this helps Joe Sweeney
|
|